copypartyvsPrysm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Prysm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 | 3 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Prysm.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Prysm details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Prysm, compare it with