# copyparty vs Portainer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Portainer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 ✓ | 38 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 ✓ | +188 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Zlib |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-portainer