copypartyvsPlausible Analytics
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Plausible Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 | 29 706 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 | +510 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 81/100 for Plausible Analytics, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.
copyparty details →Plausible Analytics details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Plausible Analytics, compare it with