# copyparty vs Pinchflat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Pinchflat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #13 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 ✓ | 5 430 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 ✓ | +62 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 65/100 for Pinchflat, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pinchflat.

If you want the quickest setup, Pinchflat is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Pinchflat](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-pinchflat