copypartyvsPimcore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Pimcore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #6 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 | 3 883 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 35 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.
Pimcore ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Pimcore details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Pimcore, compare it with