# copyparty vs Piik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Piik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 ✓ | 3 859 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | +401 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Piik, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Piik.

If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-piik