# copyparty vs pidoors

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | pidoors |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #69 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 47 177 ✓ | 26 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +394 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.4.11 · 12 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 36/100 for pidoors, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; pidoors needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+394 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [pidoors](https://selfhost.directory/project/pidoors) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pidoors.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-pidoors