# copyparty vs openvpn_webpanel_manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | openvpn_webpanel_manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #50 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 47 186 ✓ | 297 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +403 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.0.1 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 39/100 for openvpn_webpanel_manager, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for openvpn_webpanel_manager.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; openvpn_webpanel_manager needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+403 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [openvpn_webpanel_manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/openvpnwebpanelmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openvpnwebpanelmanager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-openvpnwebpanelmanager