# copyparty vs openvox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | openvox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 181 ✓ | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +398 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | 8.31.2 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for openvox.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [openvox](https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-openvox