# copyparty vs OpenSlides

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | OpenSlides |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 3 in Conference Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 185 ✓ | 661 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | 4.3.6 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 56/100 for OpenSlides, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for OpenSlides.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; OpenSlides needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [OpenSlides](https://selfhost.directory/project/openslides) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openslides.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-openslides