# copyparty vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 ✓ | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 ✓ | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-octoprint