# copyparty vs octelium

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | octelium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #22 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 47 170 ✓ | 4 133 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +397 ✓ | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

octelium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+397 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-octelium