# copyparty vs NetworkOptimizer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | NetworkOptimizer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #17 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 ✓ | 1 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 23 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.10.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 56/100 for NetworkOptimizer, so it is the safer default.

NetworkOptimizer ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [NetworkOptimizer](https://selfhost.directory/project/networkoptimizer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/networkoptimizer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-networkoptimizer