copypartyvsNetworkOptimizer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | NetworkOptimizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #17 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 | 1 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 23 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.10.3 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C# |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 56/100 for NetworkOptimizer, so it is the safer default.
NetworkOptimizer ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →NetworkOptimizer details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep NetworkOptimizer, compare it with