copypartyvsmultiwoven
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | multiwoven | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 47 177 | 1 683 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +394 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 26 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.
multiwoven ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; multiwoven needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+394 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →multiwoven details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep multiwoven, compare it with