copypartyvsmqttui
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | mqttui | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #8 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 47 168 | 224 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +395 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.0.2 · 25 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 48/100 for mqttui, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for mqttui.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+395 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →mqttui details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep mqttui, compare it with