# copyparty vs minisatip

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | minisatip |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #33 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 ✓ | 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.0.179 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 52/100 for minisatip, so it is the safer default.

minisatip ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; minisatip needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [minisatip](https://selfhost.directory/project/minisatip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/minisatip.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-minisatip