# copyparty vs Mikochi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Mikochi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #18 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 ✓ | 378 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | 1.12.2 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 50/100 for Mikochi, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Mikochi.

If you want the quickest setup, Mikochi is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Mikochi](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikochi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikochi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-mikochi