# copyparty vs magic-frame

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | magic-frame |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 ✓ | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.

magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [magic-frame](https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-magic-frame