# copyparty vs Kokoro FastAPI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Kokoro FastAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 ✓ | 5 607 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 ✓ | +132 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-kokoro-fastapi