# copyparty vs Infisical

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 ✓ | 30 118 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +702 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 79 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-infisical