# copyparty vs Healthchecks

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Healthchecks |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 ✓ | 10 466 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 ✓ | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-healthchecks