copypartyvshass-otbr-docker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | hass-otbr-docker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 38/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #90 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 | 174 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 38/100 for hass-otbr-docker, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for hass-otbr-docker.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; hass-otbr-docker needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →hass-otbr-docker details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep hass-otbr-docker, compare it with