# copyparty vs hass-configurator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | hass-configurator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 177 ✓ | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +394 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+394 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-hass-configurator