copypartyvsgrowthbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | growthbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 | 8 545 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | +124 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →growthbook details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep growthbook, compare it with