# copyparty vs drivebase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | drivebase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #17 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 168 ✓ | 594 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +395 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.0.0 · 3 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 51/100 for drivebase, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for drivebase.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [drivebase](https://selfhost.directory/project/drivebase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drivebase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-drivebase