# copyparty vs docker-webdav

> Two self-hosted [File Sharing projects](https://selfhost.directory/file-sharing), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | docker-webdav |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #52 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 47 168 ✓ | 438 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +395 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 48/100 for docker-webdav, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for docker-webdav.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-webdav is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [docker-webdav](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-webdav) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-webdav.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-docker-webdav