# coolify vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coolify | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 65 196 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 994 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v4.5.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | PHP | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

coolify scores 89/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

coolify ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

coolify is growing faster right now (+2 994 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coolify](https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-uusec-waf