# coolify vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coolify | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 65 169 | 93 034 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 967 ✓ | +1 287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v4.5.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

coolify scores 89/100 against 88/100 for uptime-kuma, so it is the safer default.

coolify ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; coolify needs more configuration.

coolify is growing faster right now (+2 967 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coolify](https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-uptime-kuma