# coolify vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coolify | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 65 235 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 990 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.5.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

coolify scores 89/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

coolify ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

If you want the quickest setup, coolify is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

coolify is growing faster right now (+2 990 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coolify](https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-tunesynctool