# coolify vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coolify | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 65 169 ✓ | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 967 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.5.3 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

coolify scores 89/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

coolify ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; coolify needs more configuration.

coolify is growing faster right now (+2 967 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coolify](https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-transfersh