# coolify vs MQTTX Web

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coolify | MQTTX Web |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 65 112 ✓ | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 910 ✓ | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v4.5.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

coolify scores 89/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

coolify ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; coolify needs more configuration.

coolify is growing faster right now (+2 910 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coolify](https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify.md)
- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-mqttx-web