# coolify vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coolify | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 65 211 ✓ | 46 462 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 009 ✓ | +1 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.5.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

coolify scores 89/100 against 86/100 for mitmproxy, so it is the safer default.

coolify ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

coolify is growing faster right now (+3 009 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coolify](https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-mitmproxy