# coolify vs ifm

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coolify | ifm |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #19 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 65 242 ✓ | 370 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 997 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.5.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.1.2 · 20 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

coolify scores 89/100 against 49/100 for ifm, so it is the safer default.

coolify ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ifm.

If you want the quickest setup, ifm is easier to run; coolify needs more configuration.

coolify is growing faster right now (+2 997 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coolify](https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify.md)
- [ifm](https://selfhost.directory/project/ifm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ifm.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-ifm