# coolify-mcp vs pikvm

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coolify-mcp | pikvm |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 27 in Server Management | #3 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 617 | 10 424 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +71 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.9.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

pikvm scores 72/100 against 51/100 for coolify-mcp, so it is the safer default.

coolify-mcp ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pikvm.

If you want the quickest setup, coolify-mcp is easier to run; pikvm needs more configuration.

pikvm is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coolify-mcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coolify-mcp.md)
- [pikvm](https://selfhost.directory/project/pikvm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pikvm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-mcp-vs-pikvm