# CookCLI vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 422 | 89 717 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +2 428 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.

CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-world-monitor