# CookCLI vs Veridrop

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | Veridrop |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #9 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 ✓ | 692 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.1.0 · 15 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

CookCLI scores 61/100 against 45/100 for Veridrop, so it is the safer default.

CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Veridrop.

If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Veridrop needs more configuration.

CookCLI is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [Veridrop](https://selfhost.directory/project/veridrop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/veridrop.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-veridrop