# CookCLI vs usque

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | usque |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #29 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 1 505 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.2.1 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

CookCLI scores 61/100 against 53/100 for usque, so it is the safer default.

CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for usque.

If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; usque needs more configuration.

CookCLI is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [usque](https://selfhost.directory/project/usque) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/usque.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-usque