# CookCLI vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 1 422 | 1 628 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uMap scores 64/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.

CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.

If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; uMap needs more configuration.

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-umap