# CookCLI vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 39 763 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +767 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.

CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

Umami is growing faster right now (+767 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-umami