# CookCLI vs Tuleap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | Tuleap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #11 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Tuleap scores 64/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.

CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tuleap.

If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Tuleap needs more configuration.

CookCLI is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [Tuleap](https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-tuleap