# CookCLI vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 424 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

CookCLI scores 61/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.

CookCLI is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-trip2g