# CookCLI vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 1 424 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

CookCLI scores 61/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.

CookCLI is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-transcriber