# CookCLI vs SparkyFitness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CookCLI | SparkyFitness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 422 | 6 497 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +397 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 26 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for CookCLI.

If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+397 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CookCLI](https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cookcli.md)
- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cookcli-vs-sparkyfitness