# ConvertX vs recyclarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ConvertX | recyclarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in File Conversion | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 226 ✓ | 2 145 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +174 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v8.8.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

ConvertX scores 74/100 against 64/100 for recyclarr, so it is the safer default.

recyclarr ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for ConvertX.

If you want the quickest setup, recyclarr is easier to run; ConvertX needs more configuration.

ConvertX is growing faster right now (+174 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ConvertX](https://selfhost.directory/project/convertx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/convertx.md)
- [recyclarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/convertx-vs-recyclarr