# ConvertX vs QMReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ConvertX | QMReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in File Conversion | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 19 226 ✓ | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +174 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ConvertX scores 74/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.

QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for ConvertX.

ConvertX is growing faster right now (+174 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ConvertX](https://selfhost.directory/project/convertx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/convertx.md)
- [QMReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/convertx-vs-qmreader