# ConvertX vs media-journal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ConvertX | media-journal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in File Conversion | #97 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 225 ✓ | 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.31.3 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ConvertX scores 74/100 against 45/100 for media-journal, so it is the safer default.

media-journal ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for ConvertX.

ConvertX is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ConvertX](https://selfhost.directory/project/convertx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/convertx.md)
- [media-journal](https://selfhost.directory/project/media-journal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/media-journal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/convertx-vs-media-journal