# consul vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 ✓ | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

ytdlp_web_player ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-ytdlpwebplayer