consulvsWeb Rendering Proxy (WRP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 30 090 | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.
consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP).
If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
consul is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).
consul details →Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) details →