consulvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 094 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
consul is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).
consul details →wraft details →